In this discussion, we delve into the intricacies of shaping a project seeking funding through the EIC Accelerator, an initiative driven by the European Commission (EC) and European Innovation Council (EIC). Designed to cater to Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs) and startups, often with the support of freelancers, professional writers, or consultants, the EIC Accelerator offers a blend of grants and equity financing options, with an enticing potential of up to €2.5 million in grant and €15 million in equity financing per project (€17.5 million in total).
Risk and Disruption: The EIC's Vision
At the heart of the EIC Accelerator lies its ambitious mission to fund disruptive innovations with a high-risk profile, frequently emerging from scientific or DeepTech domains. However, it is essential to acknowledge that high-risk projects may not always receive an overwhelming reception from the discerning EIC jury. Instances have been observed where select companies were relegated from the realm of blended financing to the more cautious grant-first EIC Accelerator mode due to perceived high risk, suggesting that most funded projects adopt a more balanced, medium-risk profile at best (see 2022 Success).
While funding disruptive innovation certainly serves as an attractive marketing pitch for the EIC, it is vital to recognize that such technologies often possess an ambitious and unproven nature in the market, factors that the EIC jury tends to view with a discerning eye. For illustrative purposes, consider the case of XYZ Tech, a company showcasing substantial market traction with its existing product lineup. However, XYZ Tech seeks funding for a highly disruptive technology that has yet to undergo real-world market testing.
Should XYZ Tech succeed in realizing its vision of disruptive Robotaxis at scale, the impact would be profound. Yet, in the absence of concrete success proof, the EIC jury may exercise prudence, hesitating to invest in an unproven technology when more established, lower-risk opportunities abound.
To Be or Not to Be Ambitious: The Challenge of Predicting Disruption
The true essence of disruptive innovations lies in their unpredictability, as they emerge from unforeseen areas and defy conventional prognostication. Attempting to predict true disruption leads to a delicate balance between extraordinary triumphs and severe losses. One of the core challenges faced by disruptive innovation lies in its paradoxical attractiveness for funding only after securing initial financial backing or achieving tangible success in the market.
Simultaneously, the EIC's Step 3 jury often exhibits a preference for proven and validated commercial strategies over untested, truly disruptive innovations, considering it a safer bet. This tendency is evidenced by instances where extremely well-funded companies secure an EIC Accelerator grant merely two weeks after raising substantial amounts from private investors (see Breaking the Rules).
Although this pragmatic approach may seem to deviate from the EIC's advertised mission, it is an approach reflective of the logical mindset embraced by astute investors. By fostering a blend of safe technology projects and high-risk innovations, the European innovation ecosystem emerges as a resounding winner.
Reality Check: The Balance Between Ambition and Practicality
Should the EIC's mission sound too good to be true, it is crucial to maintain a realistic perspective.
Drawing from experience, companies unable to secure financing beyond the EIC Accelerator may encounter diminished prospects of thriving within the program.
When seeking to engage the EIC Accelerator, companies must ensure extensive validation of both their technology and, particularly, their business model. While Steps 1 and 2 of the evaluation process may emphasize innovation and technology, the Step 3 interviews distinctly prioritize financial and commercial validation.
Projects with unproven revenue streams, uncertain customer interest, or those venturing into newly created markets may face challenges in garnering the jury's interest and securing funding.
A prudent rule of thumb for the EIC Accelerator is to possess a sophisticated and innovative technology complemented by a clear, proven, and streamlined commercial strategy. While the Step 3 jury may exhibit a high tolerance for uncertainty in technology development, it remains averse to ambiguity when it comes to commercial strategies.
You can send us a message here if you have any questions.
